How to send one email to many recipients at once. Operators will block SIM cards and cut off the Internet for anonymous subscribers Indomitable communications send me a copy

Today, courts often accept electronic correspondence as written evidence. However, to do this, it must have legal force. Meanwhile, clear and uniform rules and methods for determining the legitimacy of virtual correspondence have not yet been developed, which leads to a large number of problems.

Let's look at several ways to give emails legal force.

Long gone are the days when the only means of communication were letters written on paper. The development of economic relations between economic entities is no longer conceivable without the use of information technology. This is especially true when counterparties are located in different cities or even countries.

Communication via electronic communication helps reduce material costs, and also allows you to quickly develop a common position on specific issues.

However, such progress should not be viewed only on the positive side. Various disputes often arise between subjects of economic relations; to resolve them, they turn to the courts. The court makes a decision based on an assessment of the evidence provided by the parties.

At the same time, the relevance, admissibility, reliability of each evidence separately, as well as the sufficiency and interconnection of the evidence in their totality are analyzed. This rule is enshrined both in the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (clause 2 of Article 71) and in the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation (clause 3 of Article 67). In the process of determining the admissibility and reliability of the evidence provided, the court often asks questions, the solution of which significantly affects the outcome of the case.

The use of electronic document management in relations between business entities is regulated by the norms of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. In particular, in paragraph 2 of Art. 434 states: an agreement in writing can be concluded by exchanging documents via electronic communication, which makes it possible to reliably establish that the document comes from a party to the agreement.

In accordance with paragraph 1 of Art. 71 Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation and paragraph 1 of Art. 75 of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, written evidence is business correspondence containing information about circumstances relevant to the consideration and resolution of the case, made in the form of a digital record and received via electronic communication.

To use electronic documents in legal proceedings, two conditions must be met. Firstly, as already indicated, they must have legal force. Secondly, the document must be readable, that is, it must contain information that is generally understandable and accessible to perception.

This requirement follows from the general rules of legal proceedings, which presuppose the immediacy of judges’ perception of information from sources of evidence.

Often, the court refuses to admit as evidence to the case materials electronic correspondence that does not meet the above conditions, and subsequently makes a decision that does not satisfy the legal requirements of the interested party.

Let's consider the main ways to legitimize electronic correspondence before and after the start of proceedings.

Working with a notary

If the proceedings have not yet begun, then to give electronic correspondence legal force, you need to involve a notary. In paragraph 1 of Art. 102 of the Fundamentals of Legislation on Notaries (Fundamentals) states that, at the request of interested parties, a notary provides evidence necessary in court or an administrative body if there are reasons to believe that the provision of evidence will subsequently become impossible or difficult. And in paragraph 1 of Art. 103 of the Fundamentals stipulates that in order to secure evidence, the notary inspects written and material evidence.

According to paragraph 2 of Art. 102 Fundamentally, a notary does not provide evidence in a case that, at the time interested parties contact him, is being processed by a court or administrative body. Otherwise, the courts recognize notarized electronic correspondence as inadmissible evidence (Resolution of the Ninth AAS dated March 11, 2010 No. 09AP-656/2010-GK).

It is worth recalling that, based on Part 4 of Art. 103 Fundamentals, provision of evidence without notifying one of the parties and interested parties is carried out only in urgent cases.

In order to inspect evidence, a protocol is drawn up, which, in addition to a detailed description of the notary’s actions, must also contain information about the date and place of the inspection, the notary conducting the inspection, the interested parties participating in it, and also list the circumstances discovered during the inspection. The emails themselves are printed and filed with a protocol, which is signed by the persons participating in the inspection, by a notary and sealed with his seal. By virtue of the Determination of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation dated April 23, 2010 No. VAS-4481/10, the notarial protocol for the inspection of an electronic mailbox is recognized as appropriate evidence.

Currently, not all notaries provide services for certification of emails, and their cost is quite high. For example: one of the notaries in Moscow charges 2 thousand rubles for one page of the descriptive part of the protocol.

A person interested in providing evidence applies to a notary with a corresponding application. It should indicate:

evidence to be secured;
the circumstances that are supported by this evidence;
the grounds for which evidence is required;
at the time of contacting a notary, the case is not being processed by a court of general jurisdiction, an arbitration court or an administrative body.

Considering the technical process of transmitting emails, the places where email is detected can be the recipient's computer, the sending mail server, the recipient mail server, or the computer of the person to whom the electronic correspondence is addressed.

Notaries inspect the contents of an electronic mailbox either remotely, that is, they use remote access to a mail server (it can be the server of a provider providing an electronic communication service under a contract; a mail server of a domain name registrar or a free Internet mail server), or directly from the computer of the interested person , on which an email program is installed (Microsoft Outlook, Netscape Messenger, etc.).

During a remote inspection, in addition to the application, the notary may need permission from the domain name registrar or Internet provider. It all depends on who exactly supports the operation of mailboxes or an electronic mail server under the contract.

Certification from the provider

Resolutions of the Ninth AAS dated 04/06/2009 No. 09AP-3703/2009-AK, dated 04/27/2009 No. 09AP-5209/2009, FAS MO dated 05/13/2010 No. KG-A41/4138-10 stipulate that the courts also recognize the admissibility of electronic correspondence , if it is certified by the Internet service provider or domain name registrar who are responsible for managing the mail server.

The provider or domain name registrar certifies electronic correspondence at the request of an interested party only if it manages the mail server and such right is specified in the service agreement.

However, the volume of electronic correspondence can be quite large, which in turn can complicate the process of providing paper documents. In this regard, the court sometimes allows the provision of electronic correspondence on electronic media. Thus, the Arbitration Court of the Moscow Region, making a Decision dated August 1, 2008 in case No. A41-2326/08, referred to the admissibility of electronic correspondence provided to the court on four CDs.

But when considering the case in the appellate instance, the Tenth AAC, by its Resolution dated 10/09/2008 in case No. A41-2326/08, recognized the reference to electronic correspondence as unfounded and canceled the decision of the court of first instance, indicating that the interested party did not submit any documents provided for by the concluded parties agreement.

Thus, emails relating to the subject of the dispute must be submitted to the court in writing, and all other documents can be submitted on electronic media.

Confirming the contents of letters by referring to them in subsequent paper correspondence will help prove the facts stated in virtual correspondence. The use of other written evidence is reflected in the Resolution of the Ninth AAS dated December 20, 2010 No. 09AP-27221/2010-GK. Meanwhile, the court, when considering the case and assessing the evidence provided by the parties, has the right not to consider paper correspondence with links to electronic correspondence admissible.

He only takes it into account and makes a decision based on a comprehensive analysis of all the evidence presented.

Get help from an expert

If the proceedings have already begun, then to give electronic correspondence legal force it is necessary to exercise the right to attract an expert. In paragraph 1 of Art. 82 of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation stipulates that in order to clarify issues that arise during the consideration of a case that require special knowledge, the arbitration court appoints an examination at the request of a person participating in the case, or with the consent of the persons participating in it.

If the appointment of an examination is prescribed by law or a contract, or is required to verify an application for falsification of the evidence presented, or if an additional or repeated examination is necessary, the arbitration court may appoint an examination on its own initiative. The appointment of an examination for the purpose of verifying the evidence presented is also provided for in Art. 79 Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation.

In a petition to appoint a forensic examination, it is necessary to indicate the organization and specific experts who will carry it out, as well as the range of issues for which the interested party decided to apply to the court to order an examination. In addition, information about the cost and timing of such an examination should be provided and the full amount to pay for it should be deposited with the court. The involved expert must meet the requirements established for him in Art. 13 of the Federal Law “On State Forensic Expert Activities in the Russian Federation”.

Attachment to the case materials as evidence of an expert's opinion on the authenticity of electronic correspondence is confirmed by judicial practice (Decision of the Moscow Arbitration Court dated 08/21/2009 in case No. A40-13210/09-110-153; Resolution of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of the Moscow Region dated 01/20/2010 No. KG-A40 /14271-09).

Based on the contract

In paragraph 3 of Art. 75 of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation notes that documents received via electronic communication are recognized as written evidence if this is specified in the agreement between the parties. Accordingly, it is necessary to indicate that the parties recognize the equal legal force of correspondence and documents received via fax, the Internet and other electronic means of communication as the originals. In this case, the agreement must specify the email address from which electronic correspondence will be sent, and information about the authorized person authorized to conduct it.

The contract must stipulate that the designated email address is used by the parties not only for work correspondence, but also for transferring the results of work, which is confirmed by the position of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of the Moscow Region in Resolution No. KG-A40/12090-08 dated January 12, 2009. The Decree of the Ninth AAS dated December 24, 2010 No. 09AP-31261/2010-GK emphasizes that the contract must stipulate the possibility of using e-mail to approve technical specifications and make claims regarding the quality of services provided and work performed.

In addition, the parties may stipulate in the agreement that notifications and messages sent by email are recognized by them, but must be additionally confirmed within a certain period by courier or registered mail (Resolution of the Thirteenth AAC dated April 25, 2008 No. A56-42419/2007).

To summarize, we can say that today there is a practice of courts using electronic correspondence as written evidence. However, taking into account the requirements of procedural legislation regarding the admissibility and reliability of evidence, virtual correspondence is taken into account by the court only if it has legal force.

In this regard, a large number of problems arise, since a unified methodology for determining the legitimacy of electronic correspondence has not yet been formed. The right of an interested party to contact a notary in order to secure evidence is enshrined, but there is no regulatory act of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation regulating the procedure for the provision of such services by notaries. As a result, there is no single approach to determining their value and forming a clear mechanism for implementing this right.

There are several ways to give electronic correspondence legal force in order to present it as evidence in court: securing electronic correspondence from a notary, certification from an Internet provider, by reference to emails in further paper correspondence, as well as confirmation of their authenticity by forensic examination.

A competent approach to the timely provision of electronic correspondence as written evidence will allow business entities to fully restore their violated rights when resolving disputes.

Telecom operators can block services to subscribers who do not confirm their personal data. Previously, there were no regulations according to which subscribers and operators exchanged requests and documents. Now there are rules that explain everything - they will start working on November 4, 2017.

And although it is now clear from the papers how to confirm identity, in practice this is either difficult or not yet possible.

Why can operators block subscribers?

They have this right under the communications law. This rule worked before: operators could block subscribers whose data in the contract did not match the actual data. There were only no rules according to which operators should request these confirmations, and subscribers should send them.

Officially, the subscriber has 15 days to confirm his data after the request.

What requests are we talking about? Who is interested in the personal data of subscribers?

So far the law deals with requests from operational and law enforcement agencies. For some purpose they make requests to operators. Like, let the subscriber confirm that he is the same Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov for whom the SIM card is issued.

No one knows in advance to whom such a request will be sent and for what reason. This does not mean that the subscriber is a criminal or terrorist. The operator is obliged to respond to such a request, request data from the subscriber and transmit a response.

From June 1, 2018, Roskomnadzor will also be able to send such requests to telecom operators. If the department wants to identify the real owner of a website or the author of a post on a social network, it will do this through the cellular operator.

Why is an agreement not enough?

Even if the contract contains subscriber data, the actual owner of the SIM card may be someone else. The operator will want to know who is actually calling or sending messages from this number.

And if the contract has not been concluded, but the SIM card is active, you will have to inform who is using it. This is possible if you use an anonymous SIM card that you bought from the metro or in a shopping center.

Does this only apply to mobile communications?

No, landline too. Your home phone can also be turned off. Another check concerns the services of Internet providers. If the subscriber does not confirm the personal data in the contract, he will be left without the Internet, email and instant messengers.

How will subscribers receive a request from the operator?

First, the operator himself will receive the request. He has three days to request personal information from you.

Here are the ways you can do this:

by SMS;
through automatic calling;
by email, if the operator has an address;
in your personal account.

The operator will send a request and wait for documents from the subscriber.

How to confirm personal data?

You need to send the operator a copy of your identity document. Moreover, this should be done not as you want, but according to the rules. Otherwise, the answer will not be counted and the connection will be disconnected.

Here's how to verify your identity.

Directly from the operator. Any communication shop will not work. Where you can submit documents, you need to check with the operator. You will need the original and personal presence.

Through your personal account on the operator’s website. The document must be certified with an enhanced qualified electronic signature. This signature still needs to be obtained in advance - it is paid.

Through government services, if you have an account there. It is not yet clear how operators will receive this document. They have not yet been integrated into the overall system and cannot see the documents that subscribers send through government services. Probably this issue will be resolved somehow. Until they decide, the method will not work.

And if you don’t send anything, what will happen then? I don't want to confirm anything.

If a request comes, you will have to confirm your identity. This is the obligation of the subscriber according to the rules in the new edition. And this must be done exactly in the ways described in the rules, and not in any way you like. This is also a responsibility.

The operator's request will indicate the shutdown period. Three days before this date you will be reminded again. Then they will block access to communication services.

My SIM card is registered to a relative. Can I send a copy of his passport in response to the request?

No. The essence of the request is for the subscriber to confirm that the contract is drawn up in the name of the person using the services. He must confirm his identity himself. A copy of the passport of your mother, ex-husband or unknown person from the Internet will not solve the problem. You cannot send someone else’s document to the operator and certify it with your signature.

All data must match: in the contract, documents, personal account, electronic signature. If something does not match, you need to re-issue the contract to the actual owner.

What if I don't receive a request or can't respond on time? You never know if I’m going on vacation or if I don’t have an electronic signature.

There is nothing in the rules about this. Most likely, the operator will wait as long as he can by law. And then he will block the services to avoid problems.

But this doesn’t mean that everyone will be required to confirm their personal data?

Nobody knows from whom, when and why they will demand it. Better prepare.

I have a corporate rate. Can't they transfer my data?

Soon they will be able to. On June 1, 2018, an amendment to the communications law in this regard will come into force. If the subscriber is a legal entity or individual entrepreneur, and the SIM cards are registered to employees, their personal data can be transferred without consent.

What should you do now to respond to your request on time and not be left without communication?

Check who the SIM card is registered to, the agreement with the provider and the home phone number. Get your documents in order.

Follow notifications from the operator so you don't miss a request.

Fraudsters can take advantage of this situation to get a copy of your passport or to deceive you in some other way. Keep track of what requests you respond to and where you send documents.

We send dozens of emails every day. Sometimes these are very short messages, for example: “Shall we go to lunch?” Sometimes - with the help of which you present your business or website. When there are a lot of letters and little time, we begin to rush and make mistakes. Usually trivial, like a typo, but sometimes things happen that can seriously harm your reputation and spoil your relationship with a client or employee.

This can be avoided, you just need to be collected and know about some pitfalls. Here are the most common mistakes made when sending emails. Read carefully and remember that you first need to take a short pause, check if everything is in order, and only then click on the “Send” button.

You are typing the wrong address

The most common and most unpleasant mistake. Imagine you want to send rather personal photos to a friend, but you automatically type the address of your boss or customer. And only after the letter has left do you realize with horror what has just happened. If it’s any consolation, each of us has found ourselves in this situation at least once in our lives: lawyers sent confidential documents to the opposite party, designers sent website layouts to the wrong client, etc. But when this happens to us, it seems that the ground disappears from under our feet.

Fortunately, many email services, for example Gmail, have a function. Turn it on and specify a large time interval - it’s quieter, you know.

You forgot about the attachment

You wrote that a certain file was attached to the letter, but you forgot to attach it. Another common mistake that often leads to misunderstandings and apologies. On the one hand, it’s okay, no one is perfect, but it’s better to check everything first and only then send the letter. And to avoid questions from the recipient, we recommend listing all attached files directly in the body of the letter. For example, like this:

Hello, Maxim! I am sending you several files, they are attached:

Service Agreement

GIF with a cat

You don't think about the design

They greet you, as you remember, by their clothes. If you want to prevent your email from making you want to immediately delete it, work on its form. They say you need to devote as much time to it as to the content. Fortunately, today it's easy. To do this, we recommend using the Wix ShoutOut application, selecting a suitable template and adding your text to it. No special knowledge is required, just make sure everything looks neat and beautiful. By the way, a good newsletter has its own secrets and rules, so we recommend reading our email marketing director. Don't thank me.

You do not specify the subject of the letter

The subject of the letter performs approximately the same role as the title of the text. It appears next to your name, the recipient sees it and understands what you sent him: an invoice, meeting results, job offer, website layout, etc. Remember that the topic must be clearly formulated so that if necessary, a person will quickly find your letter, and convincing so that he becomes interested, if we are talking about, say, a newsletter. Not long ago we wrote about how, if you have forgotten, it’s worth re-reading.

You don't save drafts

If you like to write letters in text editors, then save often, otherwise you will end up writing a letter all day, and then suddenly your computer freezes and everything is gone. Or write directly in the mail service - then all your sketches will be automatically saved in the “Drafts” folder.

You are being rude

Politeness in correspondence is no less important than in life. Here are the basic rules that must be followed by everyone:

Always thank the sender for the letter, especially if you see that he did a good job. Remember when we were all taught “magic” words as children? Let's not forget them, even though we are adults.

Stay calm, even if the matter is extremely urgent and important. Nervousness and reproaches will definitely not lead to anything good.

Begin and end your letter with common phrases. The degree of formality will depend on who you are corresponding with. If this is your boss or just an official person, do not use “Hello”, “Bye” or “Kisses”. And vice versa, if you are writing to a colleague or friend, you can do without the traditional “Sincerely.”

You don't proofread the text

Typos can ruin the whole impression, so carefully re-read the written letter, preferably several times. If you have doubts about spelling or syntax, go to Gramotu.ru. It’s better to measure seven times, that is, check, than then apologize for typos and prove that you are actually literate.

And by the way: if you are afraid of accidentally sending an unfinished letter, first write the entire text in full, and only then type the recipient’s address.

You are not putting the right people on the copy of the letter

Let's figure out who might actually receive your letter. The To field is the primary recipient. Field "Ss" - the person who will receive the copy. He is not directly related to the issue being discussed, but wants or needs to be aware. The "Bcc" field is the hidden recipients. You add them, but the primary recipient doesn't see them. And here you need to be careful: you can confuse Cc and Bcc, and then the recipient will think that he is being spied on.

Keep in mind that it is important for some people to be aware of what is happening. You don’t want to listen to reproaches about “How could you not add me to the copy?! I worked on this project for two months!” If in doubt, add everyone who has anything to do with the question. Maybe not everyone will be happy that they are being distracted, but there will be no complaints against you.

You don't subscribe

You wrote “Sincerely, Masha” and think that everything is in order, but the recipient of the letter sits and wonders what kind of Masha this is. From the printing house? Or maybe an illustrator? To avoid leaving him guessing, set up a signature and it will be automatically added to the end of each of your messages. Be sure to include your first and last name, company name, position, and contact information, such as Skype or phone number. You can add an address - although this is advertising, it is unobtrusive.

You're choosing the wrong time

Writing letters at night is not a good idea. Reason one: you're probably terribly tired during the day, you're not thinking very well, and you're at risk of making all of the above mistakes. Reason two: the avalanche of morning mail will bury your midnight letter, and the addressee will definitely not see it in the near future. And third: apparently, you have nothing better to do if you are writing business letters at three in the morning.

Our advice: if nothing Important or Urgent has happened, send messages from Monday to Friday and during working hours, like all normal people.

Need to for your business? Create it yourself on Wix - it's easy and free!

Most email clients, including Gmail, Mail.ru, Microsoft Outlook, Mozilla Thunderbird, allow you to put multiple recipients in A copy(in English the abbreviation is accepted SS), or Bcc (CCB). IN Copies recipients can see other people's addresses. In the second case, the identity of additional recipients is hidden.

Adding a recipient's address

To specify the recipient(s) of the email, enter their email address in the field To whom (That):

Some email clients allow you to simply enter your username into a field, which is then automatically filled in by the program.

If you use this field to send email to multiple people, each of them will be able to see the full list of other recipients.

How to create a copy of an email

Field CC or Copy used to exchange electronic messages in a more indirect way than the field To whom. If you are not directly addressing the person in your email, but would like that person to follow the conversation in the email thread or simply be aware of the topic, the field Copy would be a great option. The addressee, who is in Copies letters, receives an unread letter in his mailbox, just like the one who was placed in the box To whom; the only difference is who you address the letter to first in the body of your email. In the professional world, mailing to Copies is used very widely and serves to keep colleagues informed about various events and topics.

You can list email recipients by simply entering a list of addresses in the field Copy, which is usually located immediately below the field To whom. Everyone in this chain of recipients will be able to see the names and email addresses of all other recipients:

How to BCC an Email

Every email client (Gmail, Outlook, Mozilla Thunderbird, Yahoo, etc.) allows the sender of an email to reach a large number of people without exposing their information to other users in the email chain. This function is called BCC or Hidden copy. You can hide recipients by entering their addresses in the field Hidden copy instead of using fields To whom And Copy:

You can use this feature for both individual and group emails. This is especially useful if you want to keep your contacts private, protect them from spam and unwanted emails, or simply if you don't want your recipients to know who received the same message.

Field Hidden copy not always available by default for all email clients. For example, in Outlook You will need to go to Options to access settings; V Thunderbird you will need to select this function from the drop-down menu; V Gmail need to press a button Copy And Hidden copy; V Windows Live Mail You will need to press the keys simultaneously Alt + B.

Image: © Web Hosting - Unsplash.com

It is obvious that e-mail has many advantages and is widely used in the process of conducting business activities.

In this article I propose to consider the issue of legal validity of electronic correspondence as evidence. We are talking about ordinary correspondence carried out by the vast majority of people, without the use of an electronic digital signature or other analogues of a handwritten signature.

Often, during a conversation with principals on a particular issue, it turns out that either the agreement was concluded by exchanging documents by e-mail, or all or part of the legally significant correspondence of the parties to the agreement was carried out by e-mail. Moreover, the principal is simply convinced that he will easily prove that he is right by referring to this correspondence and this agreement.

The question arises whether this correspondence by email proof of certain circumstances? What if the procedural opponent declares that he can also provide correspondence containing opposing information, how to give the correspondence a procedural form and legal force?

Let's go from general to specific.

Legislative regulation in the field of the use of technical means in the preparation of evidence is clearly insufficient; there is no conceptual apparatus as such; in different regulations, the same concepts are often defined differently.

Without going into the technical features of e-mail, leaving you without lengthy definitions of e-mail, information and telecommunication networks and other concepts, let’s move directly to the evidence in the arbitration process, so to speak, a little theory.

As we know, the evidence in the case is information obtained in the manner prescribed by the Arbitration Code of the Russian Federation (hereinafter referred to as the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation) and other federal laws about the facts, on the basis of which the arbitration court establishes the presence or absence of circumstances justifying the demands and objections of the persons participating in the case , as well as other circumstances relevant for the correct consideration of the case. Written and material evidence, explanations of persons participating in the case, expert opinions, specialist consultations, testimony of witnesses, audio and video recordings, other documents and materials are allowed as evidence (Article 64 of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation).

In turn, written evidence is containing information about circumstances relevant to the case, contracts, acts, certificates, business correspondence, and other documents made in the form of a digital, graphic record or in another way that allows the authenticity of the document to be established.

According to Art. 75 of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, documents received by fax, electronic or other communication, including using the information and telecommunication network “Internet”, are accepted as written evidence in cases and in the manner established by this Code, other federal laws, other legal acts or agreement or determined within its powers by the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation.

Let us leave aside theoretical disputes in the legal field about whether email correspondence is written or physical evidence, since for the required result (recognition correspondence as evidence in court) it doesn't really matter.

We proceed from the fact that the correspondence contains information about circumstances relevant to the case, no matter what it is - or any other dispute.

As we see, in order to email correspondence meets the criteria for written evidence and is admissible as written evidence, it must meet, at a minimum, the following conditions:

It must be performed in a manner that allows the authenticity of the document to be established;

It must be received in accordance with the procedure established by the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, other federal laws, other legal acts or the contract.

These criteria become a stumbling block every time you refer to email correspondence as evidence of certain circumstances.

Formally, the true content of electronic correspondence can be established by examining it at its location according to the rules of Art. 78 of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (for example, the court may require the relevant person to provide access to e-mail, to inspect a message or an attached file). Personally, I have never encountered courts doing this, although I have seen representatives rushing to see the judge with a laptop.

Regarding “must be performed in a manner that allows the authenticity of the document to be established”:

It seems that perhaps the only possible way to “materialize” electronic correspondence is to print it out on a printer. But the courts are not willing to accept such printouts as evidence, since the likelihood of falsification is high.

You can’t provide for everything, but analysis of judicial practice helps to develop a number of practical measures to make electronic correspondence “procedural.”

Make an act indicating the date and exact time of preparation. In the act, indicate information about the person who carried out the display of the correspondence on the screen and further printing (full name, position), such a person can be the head of the organization - a party to the dispute, the provider, or any other person related to the dispute.

Also in this act you should provide information about the software (indication of the browser version) and the computer equipment used. An act containing the above information, at a minimum, deprives your procedural opponent of the argument that it is not possible to establish by whom, when and with what use the correspondence was printed. At least, when I object to the inclusion of correspondence, I always refer precisely to the fact that the correspondence presented to the court does not meet the criteria of evidence precisely because it is not clear by whom, when and with what use it was produced.

Letters addressed to my client and that do not correspond to my position on the case are always “sent to spam”; I never received them.

In the act itself, be sure to indicate the sequence of actions performed when displaying the correspondence on the screen and further printing. For example, you can take the protocol of a notary’s inspection of written evidence.

Now let's turn to the reliability of email correspondence.

It seems that reliability in this case should be understood as confidence in the truth of the correspondence. Part 3 of Art. 71 of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation establishes that evidence is recognized by the arbitration court as reliable if, as a result of its verification and research, it turns out that the information contained in it is true.

How should the correspondence be carried out so that its truth is not in doubt?

First of all, it should be clear from the correspondence from whom and to whom the letter or document was sent. It seems that the identification of the parties to correspondence should be taken care of in advance by stipulating the email addresses of the parties in the contract, since it can be very difficult to prove that an email address belongs to a specific person or organization (to register an email account, you do not need to provide any identification documents , or constituent documents, registration is usually anonymous).

As follows from paragraph 3 of Art. 75 of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, the parties have the right to include in the contract a condition on the procedure for individualizing their electronic correspondence (sending messages to agreed upon email addresses) in order to give it the properties of reliability.

It is worth noting that since this method requires the parties to use exactly those email addresses that are directly indicated in the contract, which is rarely done in practice, this method of establishing the reliability of electronic correspondence is not very reliable.

For an example, look, for example, Resolution of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of the Far Eastern District dated November 16, 2012 No. F03-5177/2012 (The plaintiff’s argument about transferring disputed claims to the defendant by email was rejected because it did not indicate their receipt by the plaintiff. At the same time, it was not presented in the case materials evidence of agreement between the parties on the use of electronic documents in claim work).

If it is impossible to correlate the parties to the contract and a specific address, I can only recommend referring to clause 1 of Art. 5 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, justifying the use of e-mail in the absence of an appropriate indication in a contract or other bilateral document as a business custom, and also indicate the absence of objections from the procedural opponent to such an exchange of information.

I also note that a person conducting email correspondence on behalf of another person (or in his interests) must be authorized to do so.

Documents drawn up inconsistently, without proper specificity, will most likely be rejected by the court on the grounds of unreliability.

As for the second condition - “receipt of correspondence in the manner established by the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, other federal laws, other legal acts or the agreement.”

I have not found in the current legislation any procedure for obtaining such evidence as electronic correspondence. It seems that this correspondence should not violate the constitutional right to confidentiality of correspondence. Certification of electronic correspondence by a notary

Sometimes participants in the process ask for inclusion notarized electronic correspondence.

I will not describe how the provision of evidence by a notary is regulated; those who are interested can find it themselves; we will briefly dwell on the issue of providing evidence by a notary.

Please note that if proceedings have already been initiated, it is too late to contact a notary. Yes, I admit that the court can treat documents certified by a notary with great confidence. But there is no such requirement in the law, and accordingly it is not necessary to apply to it.

I would like to draw your attention to the following points:

The reliability of electronic correspondence in this case is limited to cases where the ownership of email addresses by the parties is not denied;

The notary is obliged to notify the parties and interested parties of the time and place of providing evidence. If the notary does not do this and the court does not establish urgent cases, then there is a possibility that the protocol for examining physical evidence (email) will be deprived of evidence.

The notary does not provide evidence in a case that is being processed by a court or administrative body at the time the interested parties contact the notary.

In conclusion, let's make a few conclusions:

Whether email correspondence constitutes written evidence is determined each time at the discretion of the court.

Considering the insufficient legislative regulation of the issue of using electronic correspondence in economic transactions, it is not possible to talk about the predetermined force of correspondence as evidence.

Considering that the court evaluates evidence according to its internal conviction, based on a comprehensive, complete, objective and direct examination of the evidence available in the case (clause 1 of Article 71 of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation), it cannot be said that the correspondence will be accepted by the court as evidence, and even if it is , then it is not possible to predict what assessment the court will give to such correspondence.

Accordingly, a position based only on electronic correspondence is extremely weak.

It cannot be said that the courts are great at accepting electronic correspondence as evidence, although there are cases of a favorable attitude towards this type of evidence as a modern, convenient, reliable, widespread method of transmitting information (see Resolution of the Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal dated April 27, 2006 in the case No. A40-20963/2005).

In general, in war all means are good and all possibilities must be used to the maximum.

I hope this article will be useful to you in your work.

If you liked this article, subscribe to the newsletter and leave your comments.

Watch an interview with an expert who certifies electronic correspondence

Best wishes,
Lawyer Mugin Alexander S.

This is not the first time I turn to your resource on topical issues, and I always find practical “grain”, without “water”. Thank you very much.

Thank you for the article!
Just in practice, he “broke” the notary’s protocol, which was drawn up at the time of the proceedings in the arbitration court.
Regarding the inspection of correspondence in court. I think the judges should inspect. But the other side must already provide evidence to substantiate its objections.
By the way, regarding the correspondence. If the correspondence was conducted through mailboxes, then as part of the pre-investigation check, police officers can send inquiries about what IP was used to access the mailbox and who owned this IP at the time of access. As an option for further proof in court.

I had a court decision where the main evidence of the fact - a significant violation of the deadlines for completing work - was correspondence on Skype, the court terminated the contract for the provision of services and ordered the contractor to return the money, based precisely on the electronic correspondence of the representatives of the parties... the only caveat is that at the court hearing the contractor’s representative did not deny that this correspondence took place

Good day, Natalia!
This once again confirms that you should not neglect such evidence as correspondence by e-mail, including via Skype.

Best wishes,
Lawyer Mugin Alexander S.

Alexander,

The question is not related to e-mail, but to a certain software package of the Customer, which is mandatory for the preparation of work completion certificates. Access to the PC is via the web. How can it be included as evidence in court?

Good afternoon

To be honest, I didn’t quite understand the question. Is it possible to somehow copy or print the “software package” onto a tangible medium? If yes, then include it, documenting it with the appropriate protocol.

Best wishes,
Lawyer Mugin Alexander S.

Good afternoon
I would ask you to comment on the situation when a party to the dispute wants to exclude from the contract the clause on the transfer of legally significant information. But we are not talking about Arbitration, but about a dispute between the bank and the bank’s client (me).
The bank blocked my accounts with reference to 115-FZ, and notified me by email (the message ended up in spam and I became familiar with its contents later at the branch after I was faced with account blocking). In the account banking agreement (accession agreement, published on the website for all bank clients) there is a clause:
Please send me documents to the specified address (we are talking about e-mail)…. I have the technical and other capabilities to receive and familiarize myself with documents....; The bank is not responsible for losses... if documents and other information are not received by me

As a rule, the service for providing electronic mail addresses is provided by third parties. Is it possible to challenge, say, the point “I have the technical and other capabilities to receive and familiarize myself with documents” in Rospotrebnadzor (as I understand it, this supervisory authority can administratively force the bank to remove illegal clauses of the contract), since I, as a client of the postal service, do not control the technical capabilities and in my opinion, this point is controversial when it comes to individuals - numerous bank clients. And later, when going to court about the illegal blocking actions of the bank, ask Rospotrebnadzor to participate in the court as a third party (as they usually write: in the interests of an unlimited number of persons) - of course, if the complaint to Rospotrebnadzor is considered positively.

Good afternoon
Of course, you can challenge either a separate clause or the entire contract as a whole. But it is not possible to assess the prospect without studying the documents. Besides, to be honest, I don’t understand what your problem is considering how you are going to solve it.

Best wishes,
Lawyer Mugin Alexander S.
- In short: The application (acceptance) for joining the banking service agreement (sorry, I misled you - the above clause is not an agreement, but an excerpt from this statement) contains the above-mentioned clause.
  
  I recently emailed. I received an email request for information with a link to 115-FZ, the letter went to spam and I did not respond to it because I did not see it. I have an impressive amount of money stuck in my accounts - everything has been settled by now, but in the future I would like to protect myself from such surprises. At the same time, a representative of the bank (financial monitoring), in response to my objections about the suspension of operations, expressed the idea that an email notification had been sent to me. Now I wonder how legal such inclusions in contracts are. In addition, if the situation turned out differently, and I had to defend my interests in court, could I ask the judge to consider this point insignificant, violating my rights - at the moment I am busy thinking about how to justify this.

Good afternoon, I have this situation. The ex-husband is a citizen of Kazakhstan, works in Russia, provided the bailiff (in Kazakhstan) with a certificate of salary of 8,400 rubles, of which he pays me alimony in the amount of 2,100 rubles (25%). The child is also a citizen of Kazakhstan, but lives under a temporary residence permit in Russia with me, my ex-husband sends alimony to my card. Can I file a lawsuit for payment of alimony in a fixed amount and in which country will I need to file the application, because: 1) he receives salary in rubles and not in tenge, 2) he worsened the child’s life (previously when he worked in Kazakhstan, alimony was 6,000 rubles). And will his correspondence on social media serve as evidence for the bailiff? networks with friends? I have the password for his mailbox, where he corresponds with friends. Where every month he discusses his salary in the amount of 32,000 + travel allowances in the amount of 5,000 rubles. Please tell me what to do. Thank you.

Good afternoon
You can file a claim for payment of alimony in a fixed amount at your place of residence.
As for the evidence for the bailiff, I don’t understand why you decided to prove something to the bailiff.
It is not possible to suggest anything specific as part of an answer to your comment - there are few introductory ones.

Best wishes,
Lawyer Mugin Alexander S.

That’s for sure: in war it’s like in war. Electronic correspondence is introduced everywhere in government bodies to receive citizens' requests. If anyone takes advantage of this offer and sends an appeal to an email box, then immediately on the second or third day request confirmation of registration of the appeal. I now have such a situation that I did not ask for confirmation and now I have tried to appeal against illegal inaction. The authority plays a fool and denies receipt, although the appeal was sent properly and there is confirmation that another addressee, to whom a copy was sent by the same letter, received the appeal. The court examined the scan of the mail at the hearing, identified the addressees, etc., did not ask questions about unreliability and refused to examine the mailbox at the court hearing, and later, after the end of the hearing, stated in its decision that the scan was not clear to the court and could not serve as evidence .

Thank you so much for this article! There doesn’t seem to be any specifics, but the thoughts are presented and presented with dignity, i.e. there is something to think about.
Thanks again!

Good afternoon
I don’t even know whether to be happy or not about such gratitude (I’m talking about “no specifics”), but thank you anyway.
It reminded me of a joke when people were flying in a hot air balloon and got lost and asked the man below where they were, to which he replied that they were in a hot air balloon. The travelers, in turn, immediately realized that they were talking to a lawyer, since his answer was correct, but useless.

Best wishes,
Lawyer Mugin Alexander S.

Hello.
I worked in an organization where all employees worked remotely, i.e. In different cities. The only way to communicate with management is by email. By mail, managers sent us instructions, orders, signed memos, etc. Naturally, communication by email is not specified in our employment contract, but the place of work is indicated, this is the home address.
Question:
1 How can I prove in court that email was the only means of communication with all employees.
2 What can be provided in court as evidence from other employees, because they live in other cities.

Good afternoon
I apologize for the delay in response.
It seems that it is not advisable for you to establish in court the fact that communication with all employees was carried out exclusively through e-mail. I can't imagine how this could help you.
Regarding the second question, I also find it difficult to answer, since the subject of the dispute is not clear enough to recommend you anything specific.

Best wishes,
Lawyer Mugin Alexander S.

Good afternoon The situation is this: there was an oral agreement with the contractor (we are both individual entrepreneurs). The conditions for it were discussed in ice. Now there is a dispute and he intends to attach a scan from this correspondence to the case in his favor. What are my chances of challenging this correspondence? Will he be able to prove that it was me who conducted this correspondence, and not someone else from my computer or from my account?

Good afternoon
You didn't pose the question quite correctly. There are chances to challenge, but I won’t tell you which ones, there are no clear criteria. Whether he can or cannot prove it, I also cannot answer you, it all depends on how he will do it and how the court will evaluate the evidence.

Best wishes,
Lawyer Mugin Alexander S.

Fundamentals of the legislation of the Russian Federation on notaries Chapter XX. Providing evidence Article 102 part 2 has become invalid. Does this mean that a notary can certify email correspondence even after the hearing of the case in court has begun?
Thank you.

- Alexander, thanks for the answer. What legal force does notarized correspondence in the form of screenshots of pages have? In particular: can this be evidence in court in this case, and how can the contents of an attachment in a letter be certified in this case? Thank you in advance.

Good afternoon. Tell me, please, are there any chances of winning in court? This is the situation.
I transferred money from my bank card to another person’s card.
A man abroad. He was supposed to buy me something and send it to me.
But he did not fulfill his obligation. Spent my money. Now he feeds me breakfast and promises to return it.
All our correspondence was conducted on Skype. There is a card number with his name, his letters stating that he spent my money.
From the relevant evidence, I can take a bank statement about the transfer of money.
What do you say? No prospect of going to court?

Good afternoon
With your “introductory” information, it is much more difficult to make the court refuse to satisfy your claims. Of course, you have every chance of getting a decision to recover funds.
The only question is the jurisdiction of the dispute. If your “villain” has never lived on the territory of the Russian Federation and does not have any property here, then you will have to file a claim at the defendant’s place of residence abroad, according to the rules established by the legislation of the relevant state.

Best wishes,
Mugin Alexander S.

Hello. If it’s not difficult, please answer this question.
I want to sue the bank.
Huge interest and fines were charged, although there were notifications about my serious health problems (by email). I want to provide correspondence in court. Do I need to have it certified by a notary, given that it seems unlikely to me that the bank will deny the fact of receiving these letters. Is it enough to simply print this correspondence with all the information from the browser (with dates, addresses...)?
Thank you!

Good afternoon
The question here is that since the evidence does not have a predetermined force for the court, it is difficult to determine how the court will evaluate this or that evidence (certified by a notary or not), so it is always better to be “too safe than not.”

Best wishes,
Lawyer Mugin Alexander S.

Hello. We have such a difficult situation. My son borrowed money from his wife’s brother, against receipt. He returned the main amount. After the divorce, this brother filed a lawsuit. with a demand to repay the entire debt, since allegedly he had not been repaid at all. My son still has correspondence on social networks, where it is said that my son was paying off his debt. And how much is left? My son repaid most of the debt in cash against a receipt. , and transferred the rest to the card of his brother and wife, since they were in another city. Question: Can email correspondence be certified as evidence?

Good afternoon
If you are only interested in this question, then yes, email correspondence can be certified as evidence, and this is exactly what the article is about.

Best wishes,
Lawyer Mugin Alexander S.

Hello!
I purchased a router in March 2015 from an online store (1 year warranty).
After the purchase, it turned out that the product was inoperative and could not be set up.
Since October 2015, I have been in email correspondence with employees of an online store who take a contradictory position: they offer to come for a refund, I come, the employees refuse to accept the goods, I report this in correspondence, the employees change their point of view and begin to demand conclusions from the SC, ignoring my references to Art. 18 of the law on ZPP.
After contacting Rospotrebnadzor, I received a letter saying that the store was ready to accept the goods, you just need to drive up.
Please tell me, can my email be considered a claim when going to court? Can I collect a penalty starting from the date of the letter? Can I receive compensation for moral damages? Have you had to come to the store several times and leave with nothing?

Good afternoon
Without knowing the contents of your letter, I cannot say whether it will be considered a claim, because it is the court that evaluates the evidence. The penalty is accrued from the date of expiration of the deadline for fulfilling the consumer’s legal requirement. Since it was not clear whether the requirement was, I cannot answer this question either. Regarding moral damage, I can only say that you can definitely demand compensation for it. But whether you will be able to receive it and whether it will be recovered from the seller, I will not say without familiarizing yourself with all the materials of the case, I am afraid to give unreasonable hope.
My colleagues from ADN Legal deal with consumer protection issues, try contacting him.

Best wishes,
Lawyer Mugin Alexander S.

Hello! She presented email correspondence to the court as evidence. The judge said it was important evidence, but it had to be certified by a notary. How to convince the court that certification of an electronic document is not the exclusive prerogative of a notary?

Good afternoon
Your question is too abstract, I believe that an answer like “you need to be very convincing, provide legal norms and examples of judicial practice to support your position” will not suit you. Although in fact it is necessary to paint the judge such a picture of the world so that he has no doubts about the optionalness of notarization of correspondence, and this is sometimes simply impossible.

Best wishes,
Lawyer Mugin Alexander S.

Hello, Alexander! As part of a labor dispute, to confirm the fact (there is no other evidence) of fulfillment of labor duties, which is denied by the employer, I would like to attach to the claim a copy of electronic correspondence with the company’s counterparties on economic and financial issues. company activities. The correspondence was carried out from my corporate email address, opened for free on Yandex. Does it need to be notarized for this purpose? The fact is that all correspondence for the period worked amounted to more than 700 letters, incl. with attachments. Is it possible to petition the court to request this correspondence from Yandex in order to avoid notarization? Should the petition be included in the claim or submitted as a separate document?
I would be very grateful for your answer.

Good afternoon
Whether it’s necessary or not, it’s better to be “over-safe than under-safe,” as they say. Moreover, if correspondence is your only evidence, then I would generally wait to go to court. It is also advisable to apply for evidence by attaching documents confirming that you have exhausted the possibilities of obtaining evidence yourself, for example, you made a request and were refused or ignored. Otherwise, the court will most likely refuse you.

Best wishes,
Lawyer Mugin Alexander S.
- Hello, if I provide the court with correspondence for consideration as evidence of the dishonesty of a former employer who does not give me documents, and he denies his involvement in the correspondence, can he file a counterclaim for libel/damage to business reputation/moral damage and etc. ?
  - Good afternoon
    Your defendant can file anything at all, the question is whether the court will accept it. I very much doubt that the court will accept such counterclaims, just as I doubt the prospects for satisfying such claims.
    
    Best wishes,
    Lawyer Mugin Alexander S.
    
    Best wishes,
    Lawyer Mugin Alexander S.

A week later (after the fact after all the copying work I did) by email. I receive an agreement in the mail with the terms of use of the images. The conditions do not suit me (the museum has the exclusive copyright, severely limited use of any parts, huge fines, the obligation to ensure the safety of copies from third parties, etc.), and I, of course, refuse to sign it. Moreover, according to the contract, the images had to be scanned by the museum, and not by me, photocopied with an amateur camera. There are also several other discrepancies in the agreement. For example, the number of photographically copied sheets is simply described, without describing the text on them, numbers and previews, incl. this applies to photographs.

I'm by email. mail invited the person (the head of the archive with whom he corresponded) to draw up an agreement on the mutual destruction of copies or the licensing of images by the Museum for free non-commercial use. use, asked for the address of the museum's lawyer. He proposed draft agreements, theses that would suit me, and asked me to show them to the museum’s lawyer. But the manager the archive clearly realized her mistake (that she did not warn me about the rules and the agreement in advance), and now she wants to hush up the matter, and does not want to change the agreement or officially destroy copies. However, it does not provide any written guarantees. In a lengthy email correspondence from the museum’s address, she offers not to sign the contract, refuses unfounded claims, and only asked for copyright information. She says that the employee made a fatal mistake, that she had no right to allow me to work without drawing up a contract. But I have no complaints. At the bottom of the letter is her first and last name, position. The name of the post contains the name of the museum. But in essence, this is a piece of paper from a legal point of view.

Everything is complicated by the fact that from the moment the work is completed in the archive (there is an entry in the visit log) until the terms of the contract are received by email. mail for signature (3-4 days passed), from my email address. The copies I made were provided to some people. I am confident in their integrity, but one cannot be completely sure of anything. From the moment you receive a copy of the contract by email. I destroyed all copies on electronic media on the Internet and sent them by email. mail notifications to recipients with a request not to publish photocopies and indicate copyright. But I cannot be sure about the use of data by third parties. At the same time, the manager tells me that you can use the data, just put a copyright.

Does it make sense to certify this email? correspondence for the future, as well as messages about copyright to third parties (my addressees), or not? And the second question, if possible -

if the museum warned me about the rules of the archive, its exceptional author. rights to exhibits, and terms of the contract exclusively by email. mail, moreover, very late in the production of photocopies of the exhibits by me, and the head of the archive in electronic correspondence refuses to destroy the photocopies and change the contract, suggests forgetting about it, in the event of theoretical claims against me from the museum for the actions of third parties and the museum proves the fact of transfer copies of images from my email. mail to third parties (in violation of the terms of the contract, which I did not sign) before the day I received the contract for signature, can I refer to the fact that I was not familiarized with the terms of the contract and author. the rights of the museum as a release from liability to the museum? In the sense that, being in the dark, I could believe that the author. the rights belong exclusively to the persons who published the manuscript (exhibit), and the exhibit is in the museum as a copy, and having received the contract, I took all actions in my power to correct the situation within my capabilities.

However, in any case, I did not intend and do not intend to use these photocopies for commercial purposes; they were needed only for historical research with publication in non-comm. electronic media in compliance with copyright.

Or should we contact the director of the museum and formally demand an agreement on mutual destruction of copies? But what then to do with those copies that, under the conditions described above, were sent to third parties, if they suddenly do not delete them, but distribute them? Maybe it’s better to keep all this quiet really... I don’t understand whether the museum in the future, if the fact of non-contractual use of copies by third parties is discovered, can make claims against me because of this (despite the fact that I did not know about the rules and publishing rights of the museum when making fair copying), or only the authors? Of all the documents confirming our relationship - a statement about familiarization with the exhibit, a signature in the visit log and a copy of the unwritten agreement by email from the director. mail, + correspondence with the head of the archive. Of the witnesses - 1-2 people who saw me at work and were present during the telephone conversation with the manager, when at the end of the first day she “remembered” about the contract.

I don’t have any money for lawyers and never will, I’m disabled, seriously ill, etc. I think a little about the future myself.

Good afternoon
Based on your input, I wouldn’t worry, to be honest, since it’s obvious that you didn’t cause any harm to anyone.

Best wishes,
Lawyer Mugin Alexander S.

Good afternoon
Tell me what to do in the following situation: there was a gray salary. Upon dismissal, it was promised that the debt on the envelope portion would be paid.
As a result, the only evidence is email and skype correspondence, in which there are amounts, promises and “come for part of the debt” and so on. On the company side, correspondence from work emails.
Is it possible to achieve anything based on this?
Thank you

Good afternoon Please tell me what to do in this situation: a person I know asked for money to develop a business (we live in different cities, regions of the Russian Federation), I took out a consumer loan from a bank and sent him funds to his card, he verbally agreed with the condition that he will return the funds in accordance with the loan agreement. (i.e. He sent me the amount of the monthly payment on the card), paid for a year and a half (loan term is 5 years), then payments on his part ended, he says that there is no way to pay anymore, and he refused the debt. There is no receipt, there is only the testimony of his wife, a paper confirming the transfer of funds to his card and correspondence on Viber. What do you advise? Is it possible to have any leverage to force a person to continue paying me? There is also another person who took the same demand as I did. a loan to develop his business, and he also stopped paying him, but the only difference between our situations is that he has a receipt, but I don’t.

Best wishes,
Lawyer Mugin Alexander S.

Hello! Please tell me, here’s one person who spread numerous information about me and my company that does not present me and the company in the best light, that I don’t pay people, I didn’t pay him money for the work, in the form of mailings to different people (I went to the client’s website under an admin account and made a mailing). Then, corresponding with this person by e-mail, he admitted that it was him and said that he allegedly conveyed the truth to people. This is a former employee of my company. As a result, I have electronic correspondence with him, all the data on him (passport, contracts), also an agreement on non-disclosure of confidential information.
Can I go to court and jail him?

Good afternoon
I answer: you can go to court, but you can go to jail - only if you don’t go to prison!
Actually, what a question, such is the answer.

Best wishes,
Lawyer Mugin Alexander S.

Hello! My situation is this: I found a new job, had an interview, they promised me that they would hire me to replace an employee who was going on maternity leave, because... There were 4 months left before the maternity leave, and the employee in the office should work only one 5/2, I was told that until the maternity leave we would work 2/2, but we would lose a little in salary. I agreed, worked for 2 weeks at my old job, went to training (2 weeks) and then it turned out that the employee refused to work according to this schedule, said that she would complain to the labor inspectorate that her rights were being violated, etc. I was offered to work as a substitute employee only on weekends with a salary of 0.25% of the tariff rate. There’s nothing to be done, I had to agree with the hope that when she goes on maternity leave, everything will work out. And now, a month and a half before her maternity leave, the following happens: the fact is that my boss and I have a 4-hour time difference, and sometimes they send official messages when we are already at home, that same employee told me to connect email to my mobile phone and always see what the bosses are sending, that is, she didn’t say that I should do it, but said that she did it. I thought that this might also be useful for me and I connected it for myself too. One late evening I saw such messages that the hair on my head began to stand up. Regional Director, Deputy, Security Council i.e. copies were sent to everyone, where the director responded to the report (the content was deleted, it was clear that this was a response